Guides
How Do You Make Public-Sector Content Accurate Without Making It Boring?
Begin with the question people actually have. Give them a reason to watch the answer.
Public communication has a demanding job. The facts need to be right, the tone needs to fit the institution, and the film still has to earn attention from someone moving through a feed. Accuracy and storytelling work best when they are developed together.
Singapore Police Force's Myth or Fact series gave us a practical example. Red Ink conceived and named the four-video format, researched common misconceptions about policing, then wrote, cast and produced short stories that led to factual answers. Each film had its own situation, but the series gave viewers a familiar way in: see the misunderstanding play out, then hear what is true.
Find the human situation inside the question
A statement can be correct and still leave the viewer at a distance. A recognisable situation gives the information a place to land. For Myth or Fact, the writers and researchers first identified misconceptions worth addressing. They then built short skits around them, with a character, a moment of tension or humour, and a question the audience could follow.
That structure did not ask comedy to carry the factual answer. It asked the story to open the door. Once the viewer understood the situation, the educational component could respond clearly.
Give the series a repeatable shape
One useful format can hold several different topics without making every film look the same. Myth or Fact used four short stories across different settings, including a void deck, roadside, car interior, police station and SPF premises. The locations and performers changed. The underlying promise stayed consistent: a relatable skit first, a factual answer after it.
This matters on social media, where a viewer may meet any instalment first. A recognisable format helps each film stand on its own while giving the whole series an identity.
Accuracy and storytelling work best when they are developed together.
Direct people, not just the camera
The cast mixed hired performers with police officers. Some officers had not acted on camera before. Rehearsal and direction helped them find a natural way to play the scenes, so the story could feel lived-in while remaining appropriate to the subject.
The four films were shot over two days. Moving between locations and working with different levels of on-camera experience required a production plan that protected both pace and performance. A clear factual message has more impact when the people delivering the story feel credible.
Make review part of the creative work
Public-facing information has people responsible for its accuracy, context and tone. Their review is part of making the film useful. Myth or Fact moved through multiple Government review layers and communication requirements while retaining its short-story format.
The practical lesson is to identify the factual answer early and understand where creative interpretation has room to work. A skit can be lively. The answer it leads to must remain clear. Writing, production and review then serve the same outcome rather than pulling in separate directions.
Keep the audience in the room
An engaging public film does not need to make the institution or the audience the joke. It needs to recognise how people encounter a question in everyday life, then answer it in a way they can follow. The best creative choice is the one that helps the message travel without changing what the message means.
Keep the audience and the facts together
That principle extends beyond policing. Health, education and corporate communications can all carry complex facts. The route into those facts should be chosen for the audience, the channel and the responsibility attached to the answer.
Common questions
What makes a public-sector video engaging?
A clear audience question, a recognisable situation and a concise answer. The story should help viewers understand why the information matters, rather than delaying the facts for the sake of a joke.
Can humour work in Government communication?
Yes, when it comes from a relatable situation and respects the people and subject involved. In Myth or Fact, the short skit drew viewers into a misconception before the film gave a factual answer.
How do review requirements shape the film?
They help define what needs to be stated precisely and which creative choices can carry it. Bringing factual owners into the writing and edit stages helps the team protect the answer while developing a watchable film.
What did Red Ink do for SPF *Myth or Fact*?
Red Ink conceived and named the series, researched the topics, wrote the skits, cast the performers and produced the four videos. The project used professional cast members and police officers across multiple settings.
THE NEXT FRAME
Have a public message that needs a story?
Tell us about the audience, the answer and the people who need to review it.
Discuss a project